Robotic laparoscopyprostatectomy offers several advantages. Although experts do not agree as to
whether robotic or open surgery is best, the majority of prostate cancer
surgeries are being done with the laparoscopic/robotic approach,
particularly at high volume medical centers that specialize in prostate cancer treatment. The
post-operative goals for treating prostate cancer are the same regardless
of whether the operation is done with an open or laparoscopic approach.
Less Scaring
The first advantage
to robotic surgery is that it is an application of advance technology and is
minimally invasive. Instead of having a 5 or 6” incision to the skin and
abdominal fascia (See image below, left), patients have a series of small
“band-aid” incisions. (On right)
A Shorter Hospital Stay
With smaller
incisions, the postoperative pain is significantly less, which means your
length of hospitalization is shorter - as is the time to return to usual
activity.
After the laparoscopic/robotic prostatectomy patients typically do not require an inpatient hospital stay over one night. Surgery is done in the morning and they typically go home after lunch on the first operative day.
Comparatively, after the open prostatectomy patients spend at least two nights in the hospital primarily for pain control, nausea and difficulty getting out of bed and getting back to an activity level that would be appropriate for them to be discharged home.
After the laparoscopic/robotic prostatectomy patients typically do not require an inpatient hospital stay over one night. Surgery is done in the morning and they typically go home after lunch on the first operative day.
Comparatively, after the open prostatectomy patients spend at least two nights in the hospital primarily for pain control, nausea and difficulty getting out of bed and getting back to an activity level that would be appropriate for them to be discharged home.
Less Drugs, More Blood
Patients' need for
postoperative pain medicine and narcotics is also greatly reduced after the
laparoscopic/robotic approach compared to open surgery.
Another advantage to robotic surgery is decreased intraoperative blood loss. During traditional open surgery, it is not at all uncommon for patients to lose between 600 cc and 1000 cc of blood intraoperatively given the intense vascularity of the prostate and its surrounding tissues. This entails some significant risk of intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (and secondarily the attendant risk of transfusion) among these patients.
During robotic/laparoscopic prostatectomy, blood loss is usually 200 cc or less, which is very minimal and has a negligible risk of needing a transfusion. This is likely a minor difference as the transfusions are quite safe. However, the small difference among treatment approaches may be quite important to some patients.
Another advantage to robotic surgery is decreased intraoperative blood loss. During traditional open surgery, it is not at all uncommon for patients to lose between 600 cc and 1000 cc of blood intraoperatively given the intense vascularity of the prostate and its surrounding tissues. This entails some significant risk of intraoperative or postoperative transfusion (and secondarily the attendant risk of transfusion) among these patients.
During robotic/laparoscopic prostatectomy, blood loss is usually 200 cc or less, which is very minimal and has a negligible risk of needing a transfusion. This is likely a minor difference as the transfusions are quite safe. However, the small difference among treatment approaches may be quite important to some patients.
Postoperative Catheterization
The third advantage
of robotic surgery over open surgery is a reduction in the required
postoperative catheterization time. After open surgery, foley catheters are
left to drain the urine for usually two or more weeks. After the robotic
approach, the catheter typically remains in place 5 to 7 days. The reason for
this difference is unclear but may be related to the increased precision and
visibility the robotic approach offers and also maybe that a running
anastamosis (bringing the bladder neck and urethral sphincter back together)
may be done in a water-tight fashion compared to the open approach.
Erectile Function
The fourth advantage
of robotic prostatectomy is the (at least theoretical) improved ability to
preserve the erectile nerves. During an open prostatectomy through an incision
on the anterior abdominal wall, the nerves that provide erection are hidden
behind the prostate. The approach taken using the surgical robot, enters the
abdomen and the robotic arms are positioned posterior to the prostate with the
nerves directly in front of the robotic/laparoscopic camera. In this way, the
nerves maybe preserved, primarily because the anatomy can be seen more clearly
compared to open surgery.
In addition, the decreased blood loss of the robotic approach improves the intra-operative visibility. As you can imagine, attempting to preserve delicate nerve structures can be quite challenging in the pool of blood versus in a relatively dry surgical field that is expected with the laparoscopic/robotic approach.
In addition, the decreased blood loss of the robotic approach improves the intra-operative visibility. As you can imagine, attempting to preserve delicate nerve structures can be quite challenging in the pool of blood versus in a relatively dry surgical field that is expected with the laparoscopic/robotic approach.
Neither clinical nor imaging tests are sensitive enough to capture a tumour at T3 stage where it has become locally advanced and a risk for spreading to other body parts. Sometimes it is difficult for surgeons to find a precise plane between the cancer and urinary sphincter or the nerves and err on the side of cancer safety leading to incontinence or Impotence Da vinci robot system minimizes side effects thereby greater control for the patient over urinary discharge i.e. continence and return to normal sexual function after the surgery.
No comments:
Post a Comment